3M Defective EarplugsMass TortsGiven 3M Combat Arms Earplugs? 3M has agreed to pay $9.1 million for knowingly selling defective earplugs.

February 14, 2019by Shamis & Gentile P.A.
https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/5dc.63d.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/3M-defective-combat-earplugs.jpg?time=1573911710

Whistleblower allegations were revealed stating that 3M, a defense contractor, sold defective Combat Arms Earplugs, Version 2 (CAEv2) to the military from 2003 to 2015. The now-discontinued dual-ended 3M defective combat earplugs were reportedly standard-issue for military service members from 2003 to 2015.

3M Defective Combat Earplugs Causing Tinnitus & Hearing Loss

The 3M defective combat earplugs may have caused significant hearing loss in military veterans, including combat veterans who did tours in Afghanistan or Iraq; reserve members who were stateside but routinely fired weapons for training; as well as Navy and Air Force personnel. Current and former military service members who served any time from 2003 to 2015 may be entitled to compensation from 3M for their hearing loss or tinnitus.

In a whistleblower lawsuit on behalf of the U.S. government, a qui tam relator brought forth allegations that 3M and its predecessor corporation, Aero Technologies, knew about the design defect since 2000, when the combat earplugs failed to show any noise-reduction benefit. Yet, the 3M whistleblower lawsuit alleges, 3M continued selling the CAEv2 3M defective combat earplugs to the Defense Logistics Agency, which supplies equipment to U.S. troops, navy, and air force personnel. In its answer to the 3M whistleblower complaint, 3M admitted that Aero had tested the earplugs in 2000 and that the test came back with a noise reduction rating (NRR) of 0, meaning the 3M defective combat earplugs had no noise reduction benefits.

The U.S. government later intervened in the whistleblower’s lawsuit, with slightly different allegations. The United States alleged that:

“3M, and its predecessor Aero, knew that the CAEv2 [Combat Arms Earplug version 2] was too short for proper insertion in users’ ears and … 3M did not disclose this information to the United States and delivered the CAEv2 to the United States knowing that the product contained defects…”

In the settlement agreement for the whistleblower earplug lawsuit, 3M agreed to pay the United States government $9.1 million.

(1) What were the 3M defective combat earplugs intended purpose?

3M won an exclusive contract to sell combat earplugs to the U.S. military, and sold millions of earplugs to the armed forces from 2003-2015. The dual-ended earplugs had a yellow and black end and were intended to be versatile to provide hearing protection while enabling service members to communicate when necessary. One side of the earplugs was intended to block all sound, including voices, like traditional, non-combat earplugs. The other side of the combat earplugs was supposed to block loud impulse sounds on the battlefield, while still allowing spoken words and commands through.

(2) What was the defect in the 3M combat earplugs?

Instead of blocking sound as intended, 3M used a design that allowed the earplugs to loosen in the wearer’s ear. The yellow fins on the earplug interfered with forming a tight seal in the wearer’s ear canal, unless folded back, according to a whistleblower. Testing by the company that invented the earplugs showed that the earplugs had a noise reduction rating (NRR) of zero, as 3M admitted in a False Claims Act lawsuit. Because of this defect, service members may have suffered hearing loss and tinnitus from combat noise, firing weapons in training, or aircraft noise.

(3) Can veterans get compensation from a 3Mdefective combat earplugs lawsuit beyond VA disability?

Through our investigation, we have learned that many affected military members receive partial disability and hearing aids from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), but they may still be entitled to compensation from 3M for injuries they suffered, including tinnitus, hearing loss, or other health issues caused by the Combat Arms earplugs. Important Note: We are pursuing lawsuits against 3M ONLY, not the U.S. Government or armed services. If you qualify, you can join with other active military and veterans in asserting your legal rights against 3M.

(4) How can I contact your 3M defective combat earplugs lawyers about a claim?

Our team of 3M defective combat earplugs lawyers have a dedicated number to field calls from veterans and active servicemembers who have potential claims against 3M for defective combat earplugs. The number is: 305-479-2299.

(5) How much do I have to pay you to file an ear plug lawsuit on my behalf?

If we lose, you don’t have to pay us anything. If we win, our fees are only a minority share of your potential damages award.

(6) Are the 3M defective combat earplugs lawsuits a class action?

No, the 3M defective combat earplugs lawsuits looks like they will be litigated as a mass tort, not a class action. In a class action, a single plaintiff or group of plaintiffs seek to represent all the other people in a similar situation — mostly people who have not filed their own individual lawsuits. In a mass tort, everyone files their own individual lawsuit. But the cases are often consolidated in front of a single judge.

3M defective combat earplugs Lawyer | Shamis & Gentile, P.A.

IRAQ or AFGHANISTAN veteran? Given 3M Combat Arms Earplugs? 3M has agreed to pay $9.1 million for knowingly selling defective earplugs. Contact Shamis & Gentile, P.A. if you wore standard-issue 3M Defective Combat earplugs and have hearing loss or tinnitus (diagnosed or undiagnosed). You may be entitled to compensation. Contact us for a free, no obligation case review info@shamisgentile.com or call 305-479-2299. Let us help you.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This