Is Your Car Totaled? | Total Loss Car Accident Lawyers
Did you have a vehicle (owned or leased) totaled while covered under an auto insurance policy in the last 5 years?
Did your insurance company cover the value of the car but not the sales tax and other fees?
Insurance companies may not be reimbursing their policyholders for the full value of their total loss vehicle, according to recent consumer allegations.
Total loss car accident class action lawsuits filed against insurance providers claim that the companies violate their own contracts by failing to reimburse policyholders for sales tax, title transfer fees, tag transfer fees, and more after a total loss car accident.
Consumers taking action against insurance companies argue that they are owed hundreds to thousands of dollars.
Class action claims have been filed against insurance companies such as GEICO, but other insurance companies may also be guilty of underpaying their policyholders following a total loss car accident.
If you were insured under an auto insurance policy, experienced a total loss car accident, and were not reimbursed for sales tax and other fees by your insurance company in the last 5 years, you may qualify to join a total loss car accident class action lawsuit investigation.
See if you qualify by filling out the free form on this page.
Total Loss Car Accident Overview
Following a car accident, an insurance adjuster investigates the crash and the damage to the car to make a determination regarding reimbursement.
If the insurance adjuster finds that the loss of value or repair cost exceeds the insured value, the insurance company may deem the vehicle a “total loss” or “totaled.”
What happens next depends on individual policies and insurance companies, but policyholders are often offered the fair market value of the car as of the day of the accident.
Insurance Total Loss Car Accident Class Action Lawsuit
Several total loss class action lawsuits have been filed against GEICO alleging that the insurance company fails to pay costs associated with a car accident total loss including sales tax and title transfer fees.
Plaintiffs claim that costs such as sales tax and title transfer fees are included in GEICO insurance policies and that failure to pay these costs is a breach of contract.
The total loss car accident class action lawsuits argue that sales tax and other fees “are components of ‘actual cash value’ under the policy.”
Policyholders argue that costs such as sales tax and title fees are mandatory when purchasing or leasing a replacement vehicle to replace a total loss vehicle.
Sales tax varies depending on each state but can be hundreds to thousands of dollars. Adding fees to this total means that the lack of reimbursement can cause significant financial strain on policyholders.
For example, the GEICO policyholder who filed an insurance total loss class action lawsuit in Florida was forced to pay a minimum of $75.25 to transfer her title and 6 percent of the replacement car’s value in sales tax. The total was around $1,500.
“the offices of Shamis & Gentile, Pa were fantastic. Throughout the process everyone was professional and easy to work with. Their communication was easy to understand and they were a pleasure to work with. The best thing is… they got results for me! Thank you!”
Rob W.
Shamis & Gentile Client
Total Car Loss FAQ’s
What is a “Total Loss” Class Action Lawsuit Investigation?
Total loss car accident class action lawsuits filed against insurance providers claim that the companies violate their own contracts by failing to reimburse policyholders for sales tax, title transfer fees, tag transfer fees, and more after a total loss car accident. The total loss car accident class action lawsuits argue that sales tax and other fees “are components of ‘actual cash value’ under the policy.”
Policyholders can argue that costs such as sales tax and title fees are mandatory when purchasing or leasing a replacement vehicle to replace a total loss vehicle.
How do I know if I qualify for the totaled car accident Class Action?
You may qualify for this investigation if:
- Your vehicle was totaled after a car accident
- Your insurance company paid for the total loss and not the other driver’s insurance company.
If you were insured under an auto insurance policy, experienced a total loss car accident, and were not reimbursed for sales tax and other fees by your insurance company in the last 5 years, you may qualify to join a total loss car accident class action lawsuit investigation.
Does the Lawsuit also cover a total loss lease car or financed car?
Yes, depending on the coverage of the policy. The coverage on a rental is usually limited to a maximum of 30 days, seldom long enough to resolve a total loss claim, especially where the insured can’t accept the insurance company’s offer.
How does the insurance company determine if your car should be totaled?
According to DMV.org, a damaged vehicle is labeled a “total loss” by the insurance company “when the cost to repair the vehicle to its pre-damaged state exceeds the cost of the vehicle’s worth, or actual cash value”. Determining whether a vehicle is a total loss depends on the car insurance company’s standards, the vehicle’s condition, and state laws.
What is included in a total loss settlement from my insurance company?
After a total loss car accident, owners may have to pay costs like the car’s sales tax, title transfer fees, and other costs. The car’s value is usually assessed as the fair market value of the car on the day of the accident. After an accident occurs, the insurance company assesses the damage done to a car so they can make a determination of how much the insurance company should reimburse the policyholder. Car insurance policies should cover the cost of all of the fees and expenses associated with a total loss car accident. However, some companies may just be covering the cost of the car itself after a total loss car accident, in an effort to pay out less money in a claim.
What should I do if my car is totaled by the insurance company and I do not agree with the settlement?
If you disagree with the settlement, you can dispute and challenge the amount. You can also sue if you are treated unfairly. Insurance companies will generally ask you to provide documentation to back up the reason for your disagreement. Insurance companies then review the documentation for accuracy and applicability to the total loss vehicle. If there is still disagreement, state law and the terms of your policy describe how an appraisal process will resolve the differences.
Your insurance company will hire an appraiser to appraise your vehicle. If you do not hire your own appraiser, then the insurance company will pay you what they deem is appropriate. In effect, you will be stuck with the insurance company’s valuation of your vehicle. Once both appraisers have compiled their reports, they try to reach an agreement on the value of your vehicle before scheduling a formal hearing, and make a determination as to which appraiser is right about the vehicle’s value.
You can also sue under the following laws:
-
Low-Ball Offer.
Compelling a policyholder to institute litigation to recover amounts due under an insurance policy by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered in actions brought by insureds, when the insureds have made claims for amounts reasonably similar to the amounts ultimately recovered, is an unfair practice. [Insurance Code § 790.03(h)(6)] The California Insurance Commissioner Regulations states in part: “No insurer shall attempt to settle a claim by making a settlement offer that is unreasonably low.” [California Code of Regulations Title X, Chapter 5, Subchapter 7.5, § 2695.7(g)]
-
“Forcing” appraisal.
An insurer’s delay in payment of first party benefits could be found to have been made unreasonably, thereby “forcing” the insured to go through an appraisal procedure. If such a finding is made, that would constitute a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, which will support a claim for bad faith. [Bernstein v. Travelers Ins. Co., 2006 WL 2567875, pg. 6-7 (N.D. Cal. 2006)
-
Delay in making payments.
The actionable withholding of benefits may consist of unreasonably delaying payments when due. [Major v. Western Home Ins. Co., 169 Cal. App. 4th 1197, 1209, 87 Cal. Rptr. 3d 556 (4th Dist. 2009)] Insurance Code section 790.03 defines as deceptive acts or practices in the business of insurance certain acts performed by an insurer towards its insured. An insurer: “Not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair, and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become reasonably clear is an unfair practice.”
Shamis & Gentile, P.A. has Won Eight Figure Settlements for our Clients
Outstanding legal services to class members across the country. Offices in Florida, New York, Texas, Georgia, Ohio, Illinois, Arizona, Missouri, and Washington. We have recovered over $500 million with over 100,000 cases litigated.
Large Clothing Retailer
Spam Text Message
Credit Service Company
Spam Text Message
Utilities Company
Spam Text Message
